CH
Capri Holdings Ltd (CPRI)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary
Executive Summary
- Q3 FY2025 revenue was $1.26B (down 11.6% YoY) and adjusted EPS was $0.45; GAAP results reflected a large, non-cash impairment ($675M) driving a GAAP net loss of $(547)M or $(4.61) per share .
- Segment performance: Michael Kors revenue $0.91B with 16.2% operating margin, Versace $0.19B with (10.9)% margin, Jimmy Choo $0.16B with (3.8)% margin .
- Guidance: FY25 revenue ~$4.4B and adjusted operating income ~$$100M; FY26 revenue ~$4.1B and adjusted operating income ~$150M, with cost actions to reduce operating expenses by ~$200M; Q4 FY25 revenue guided to ~$0.98B and operating loss of ~$25M .
- Balance sheet/liquidity: net debt fell to ~$1.12B; amended credit agreement added a $700M term loan and extended revolver and term loan maturities to July 2027, repaying near-term loans (Versace €450M and $450M DDTL) .
- Stock catalysts: aggressive pricing architecture reset at Kors, Versace assortment rebalancing (Tag Bag, Galaxia sneaker), wholesale stabilization expected after a steep Q4 decline, and Investor Day on Feb 19 detailing brand strategies and margin path .
What Went Well and What Went Wrong
What Went Well
- Free cash flow positive: operating cash flow $309M and FCF $278M in the quarter; inventory down 13% YoY to $892M, reflecting improved working capital management .
- Michael Kors profitability remained resilient with 16.2% operating margin despite revenue declining 12% YoY; management is refocusing on heritage “Jet Set” and price architecture to restore full-price sell-throughs .
- Consumer engagement: databases grew (Versace +1.1M, +15%; Jimmy Choo +0.7M, +12%; Kors +9M, +11%), indicating brand awareness underpinning future demand .
- Management quote: “We expect our performance to improve throughout fiscal year 2026 positioning us to return to growth in fiscal 2027 and beyond.” – John D. Idol .
What Went Wrong
- Group revenue down 11.6% YoY with broad-based regional weakness (Asia down 20% for the group; outsized decline in China) and wholesale contraction; gross margin compressed 60bps to 64.4% on lower full-price sell-throughs .
- Non-cash impairments ($675M OpEx, $602M net impact or $5.08/share) drove GAAP operating loss of $(590)M and GAAP EPS of $(4.61) .
- Versace and Jimmy Choo posted operating losses; missteps in Versace assortment (too few statement items, reduced entry-level luxury offerings) and elevated pricing at Kors pressured sales and AURs; management is reversing course .
Financial Results
Consolidated P&L and Margins (oldest → newest)
Segment Revenue and Operating Margins (oldest → newest)
KPIs and Balance Sheet
Guidance Changes
Earnings Call Themes & Trends
Management Commentary
- Strategic reset: “We made a number of missteps… in particular, at Versace and Michael Kors… We are refocusing on the heritage of the Michael Kors brand… and rebuilding our core and signature assortments” – John D. Idol .
- Pricing/AUR: “Our AUR is down… by lowering certain prices… and getting better full price sell-throughs, we think we’ll elevate AUR to flat or growth next year” – John D. Idol .
- Wholesale trajectory: “The greatest impact… in Q4… wholesale… last very large decline… accelerates in Q2–Q4 next year as strategies flow” – John D. Idol .
- Cost actions and margins: “We expect expenses to decline approximately $200 million… as a result, operating income of approximately $150 million in fiscal 2026” – Thomas Edwards .
- Liquidity: “Cash $356M and debt $1.48B… net debt ~$1.12B; strong free cash flow generation” – Thomas Edwards .
Q&A Highlights
- Pricing architecture and AUR: Management acknowledged price hikes alienated Kors’ core consumer; resetting to good-better-best, lowering certain price points to drive full-price sell-throughs and ultimately higher gross margins/AURs over time .
- Wholesale normalization: Q4 will reflect the steepest wholesale decline (~30%); partners responded positively to Fall 2025 lines, with stabilization expected through FY2026 as sell-in improves .
- Asset sale speculation: Company will always consider shareholder value but strategy is to build all three houses; not focused on divestitures currently .
- CapEx and store actions: FY25 CapEx ~$125M; similar in FY26 supporting Kors renovations; closing ~70–75 stores next year (majority Kors full-price); investing in e-commerce and data analytics .
- Debt and FCF: Ending FY25 net debt expected ~$1.2B; FY26 targeted ~$200M lower, while funding marketing, analytics, and store renovations .
Estimates Context
Wall Street consensus EPS and revenue for Q3 FY2025 via S&P Global were unavailable at time of writing due to a temporary SPGI limit. As a result, we cannot assess beats/misses versus consensus for revenue or EPS in this recap. Adjusted EPS was $0.45 and revenue was $1.26B, per company disclosures .
Key Takeaways for Investors
- Q3 print was weak on revenue/margins YoY and GAAP results were distorted by large, non-cash impairment; adjusted operating margin improved sequentially to 6.0% from 3.0% in Q2, suggesting early benefits from cost actions .
- Michael Kors strategic reset (heritage “Jet Set,” rebuilt signature/core, price architecture normalization) is the pivotal driver for FY26–27 margin recovery and top-line stabilization; watch full-price sell-throughs/AUR trends starting Spring/Fall .
- Wholesale is the swing factor near term: expect the steepest decline in Q4 (~30%), then moderation; better sell-in indicates potential stabilization through FY26 .
- Liquidity improved with extended maturities to July 2027 and net debt down to ~$1.12B; strong Q3 FCF ($278M) provides runway to fund marketing and store renovations .
- Versace recalibration (more energy, entry-level luxury balance) and product launches (Tag Bag, Galaxia sneakers) target aspirational consumers; monitor mix and margin progression in FY26 .
- FY25 guide is conservative (revenue ~$4.4B, adjusted OI
$100M); FY26 indicates expense reduction ($200M) and modest gross margin expansion; stock likely reacts to tangible evidence of pricing reset efficacy and wholesale stabilization at Investor Day . - Risks: continued Asia/China weakness, execution risk in assortment/pricing, and wholesale partner alignment; legal overhang from terminated Tapestry merger appears contained with reimbursement; FX headwinds embedded in guides .